Delhi High Court · Independent practice
Advocate Adesh Kumar
Cyber law, digital evidence & data protection — as Indian courts actually see them. Civil and criminal counsel in Delhi and the NCR where digital facts sit at the centre of the file.
Series: Digital disputes, as Indian courts actually see them
What this desk explains
Public legal talk often collapses proof into slogans: screenshots as “evidence,” freezes as “guilt,” admin roles as authorship, VPN as a magic shield. Indian courts still ask narrower questions — custody, attribution, process, and what the statute actually covers.
This site is an education desk for those questions: short Insights drawn from practice before the Delhi High Court, written so a non-lawyer can follow the door the court is likely to open.
Areas of work
Cyber law
Online disputes, IT Act fact patterns, platforms, publication, and intermediary questions as procedure — not headlines.
Digital evidence
How chats, emails, logs, devices, and freezes are preserved, attributed, and proved when the other side denies them.
Data protection
DPDP and digital compliance questions that surface inside disputes — purpose, consent, erasure, and grievance paths.
Civil & criminal (digital)
Counsel where records, platforms, payments, or devices decide the shape of the civil or criminal file.
About the practice
I am an Advocate practising before the Delhi High Court, with an LL.M. in Cyber Law. Member, Delhi High Court Bar Association. Independent practice in Delhi / NCR.
I write publicly on how Indian courts treat digital disputes — as proof problems, not slogans.
Write with a procedural question
If you have a question about how a digital fact pattern is usually framed in court — evidence, freeze, platform, or DPDP process — use the contact form. This website is for education and general enquiry. It does not create an advocate–client relationship and is not solicitation.